tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15134410.post114165537117891179..comments2023-11-03T08:54:16.415+00:00Comments on rsingh: SGPC Changing MaryadaRavjeet Singhhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04770073683514199798noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15134410.post-1142697693942921622006-03-18T16:01:00.000+00:002006-03-18T16:01:00.000+00:00nope I have old recordings of Gyani Gurbaksh Singh...nope I have old recordings of Gyani Gurbaksh Singh Gulshan that just general about SRM. I didnt record that program sorry.Ravjeet Singhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04770073683514199798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15134410.post-1142684683328593002006-03-18T12:24:00.000+00:002006-03-18T12:24:00.000+00:00RSingh do you any recordings of Giani Amarjeet Sin...RSingh do you any recordings of Giani Amarjeet Singh Gulshan when he came on Panjab Radio recently talking about the claims that the SRM has been changed? If you do, please share them with the Sangat.<BR/><BR/>Daas,<BR/>Manvir Singh.Manvir Singh (UK)https://www.blogger.com/profile/17987883036901467330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15134410.post-1141812779077310512006-03-08T10:12:00.000+00:002006-03-08T10:12:00.000+00:00No lol See the time on my post and Manvir Singh's ...No lol <BR/>See the time on my post and Manvir Singh's comment. :) He's got a nice blog though. Unfortunately I haven’t had much time to ready many other blogs recently.Ravjeet Singhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04770073683514199798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15134410.post-1141812232691845662006-03-08T10:03:00.000+00:002006-03-08T10:03:00.000+00:00parji isn't this post from Confused Khalsa's blog?...parji isn't this post from Confused Khalsa's blog?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15134410.post-1141687844270721652006-03-06T23:30:00.000+00:002006-03-06T23:30:00.000+00:00Agree with you 100%. SGPC is not Sarbat Khalsa nor...Agree with you 100%. SGPC is not Sarbat Khalsa nor does it have authority of Sri Akaal Takhat Sahib jee.<BR/><BR/><I>The original Rehat Maryada clearly mentions that no Sikh could remarry when his wife was alive. However, the amended Maryada has added the word ‘generally’ that reads, “Generally, no Sikh should marry a second wife if the first wife is alive.” </I><BR/>Hasn't this been in Rehat Maryada from the beggining? I have a copy of SRM and "Generally" is written in it. So how come this is in the news now?Manvir Singh (UK)https://www.blogger.com/profile/17987883036901467330noreply@blogger.com