Monday, March 06, 2006

SGPC Changing Maryada

Change in Maryada draws criticism
Varinder Walia
Tribune News Service
Amritsar, March 5

The amendment in the Sikh 60-year-old Rehat Maryada by the SGPC has evoked a strong reaction from Sikh intellectuals.
Mr Gurcharnjit Singh Lamba, a Sikh intellectual and Editor of monthly ‘Sant Sipahi’, has said the Sikh Maryada was formulated after marathon discussions and hence any amendment without taking the Sikh Panth into confidence was unacceptable to the sangat. He was here today to pay his obeisance at Harmandar Sahib.


A comparative study of two versions of the ‘Sikh Rehat Maryada’ - one of 1945 and the recent one published by the SGPC - shows glaring discrepancies.
Questioning the wisdom of changing the Article on re-marriage, Mr Lamba alleged the amendment was aimed to benefit certain influential persons who had indulged in bigamy. The original Rehat Maryada clearly mentions that no Sikh could remarry when his wife was alive. However, the amended Maryada has added the word ‘generally’ that reads, “Generally, no Sikh should marry a second wife if the first wife is alive.”


Another glaring amendment in the new version is on the definition of a Sikh. The Punjabi version of the original Maryada gives the definition of a Sikh as “Any human being who believes in all Sikh Gurus in One Immortal Being, (ii.) Ten Gurus, from Guru Nanak Sahib to Guru Gobind Singh Sahib, (iii.) Guru Granth Sahib, and the utterances and teachings of the 10 Gurus and baptism bequeathed by the tenth Guru, and who does not owe allegiance to any other religion, is a Sikh.

However, the amended Punjabi version has deleted ‘Dassan’ (meaning all 10 from Guru Nanak to Guru Gobind Singh).

Mr Lamba further alleges that the deletion of ‘plucking of gray hair’ from the new version of Maryada was a blunder on the part of the SGPC.
He also criticised a section of the Sant Samaj for pursuing its own Maryada which was in sharp contrast to the original version, passed with the consent of the Sikh sangat.


Unbelievable they had the nerve to even think about changing it. AGPC are just meant to distribute the Panthic maryada which was decided upon on by Sarbat Khalsa. They actually have the nerve shows how free Sri Akal Takath Sahib is. If the Jathedar isn’t under any prabandi (restrictions) he will summon the head of SGPC and punish them but I really doubt the happening. Its so fustrating its hard enough getting the Panth to follow Rehit Maryada which was at the time formed collectively by the panth. Today people have formed there on sects, and dera passing of there own mardyadas as the ones from times of Guroo Gobind Singh Sahib. How messed can we get its unbelievable.

5 comments:

Manvir Singh Khalsa said...

Agree with you 100%. SGPC is not Sarbat Khalsa nor does it have authority of Sri Akaal Takhat Sahib jee.

The original Rehat Maryada clearly mentions that no Sikh could remarry when his wife was alive. However, the amended Maryada has added the word ‘generally’ that reads, “Generally, no Sikh should marry a second wife if the first wife is alive.”
Hasn't this been in Rehat Maryada from the beggining? I have a copy of SRM and "Generally" is written in it. So how come this is in the news now?

Anonymous said...

parji isn't this post from Confused Khalsa's blog?

rsingh said...

No lol
See the time on my post and Manvir Singh's comment. :) He's got a nice blog though. Unfortunately I haven’t had much time to ready many other blogs recently.

Manvir Singh Khalsa said...

RSingh do you any recordings of Giani Amarjeet Singh Gulshan when he came on Panjab Radio recently talking about the claims that the SRM has been changed? If you do, please share them with the Sangat.

Daas,
Manvir Singh.

rsingh said...

nope I have old recordings of Gyani Gurbaksh Singh Gulshan that just general about SRM. I didnt record that program sorry.